9911796707
TMI Blog2020 (3) TMI 1375X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ons; firstly, the revision petition challenging the order dated 21.01.2019 passed by the trial Court by which the petitioner was summoned through arrest warrant has already been dismissed by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in SANJAY SETHI S/O SHRI SWAROOP CHAND SETH VERSUS UMA NAND VIJAY ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT [ 2020 (1) TMI 1524 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] . Secondly, sim ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... sh Khandelwal, Mr. Devesh Yadav, Ms. Ritu Pathak ORDER The present bail application has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in connection with Criminal Complaint No.10/2018 registered for offences under Sections 3 4 of Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (hereinafter to be referred as Act of 2002). Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicat ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... l Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No.792/2020 which was disposed of by the Hon ble Supreme Court vide order dated 10.02.2020 which reads as under:- Heard learned counsel for both sides. We do not see any reason to interfere in these matters. The special Leave Petitions are, accordingly, dismissed. However, the interim orders passed by this Court on the earlier occasions shall continue to operate ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... tion and other connected matters vide order dated 24.01.2020 and the revision petition filed by the petitioner was also dismissed by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 31.01.2020. Learned Senior counsel further submitted that other similarly situated co-accused have already surrenderd before the trial Court and their are in custody. Learned senior counsel further submits that since a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... econdly, similarly situated co-accused have already surrendered before the trial Court after dismissal of their petitions by this Court as well as by the Hon ble Supreme Court; thirdly, the petitioner is involved in serious economic offence, therefore, in the facts and circumstances of the present case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am not inclined to enlarge the peti ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
