9911796707
TMI Blog2019 (6) TMI 1646X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ES LTD. [ 2019 (2) TMI 316 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI ], and according to the said order no duplicate claim would be maintainable for the same set of claim and default. It is pertinent to mention that the claims of the applicant have already been admitted against the principal borrower - the present application is not maintainable and is dismissed as such. List on 11.07.2019. - (IB)-1083(PB)/2018 - - - Dated:- 13-6-2019 - M.M. KUMAR, C.J. (PRESIDENT) AND SANTANU KUMAR MOHAPATRA, MEMBER (T) For the RP: Sanjay Bhatt, Adv. and Kiran Sharma, CS For the Appellant : Ankur Khandelwal, Gowrang, Prabhat Kumar Chaurasia, Jasdeep Singh Dhillon, Mansi Kukreja, and Chitranshul Singh, Advs. ORDER CA ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... l list under Regulation 36A (10) of the CIRP Regulations. He further added that as per Regulation 36(B) of CIRP Regulations, the RFRP shall allow prospective resolution applicants a minimum of thirty days to submit the Resolution Plan. The Chairman informed that post receipt of Resolution Plan, he will examine each resolution plan received by him to confirm that each resolution plan provides for and confirm to the requirement mentioned under Section 30(2) of the Code. He further informed that as per Regulation 39(4) of the ICRP Regulation, the Resolution Professional shall endeavour to submit the resolution plan approved by the committee to the Adjudicating Authority, at least fifteen days before the expiry of the maximum period ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... one within two weeks. CA-1125(PB)/2019 stands disposed of. CA-673(PB)/2019 The instant application has been filed by the Suraksha Asset Reconstruction Pvt. Ltd. against the rejection of its claims by the Resolution Professional. The stand taken by the Resolution Professional in the reply dated 10.05.2019 is that the claim of the applicant as a financial creditor are already admitted in the case of Union Bank of India v. Era Infra Engineering Pvt. Ltd. CP. No. (IB)- 190(PB)/2017. The RP has placed reliance on the order passed by the Hon hie Appellate Tribunal in the case of Dr. Vishnu Kumar Aggarwal v. Piramal Enterprises Ltd. (Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 346/2018 347/2018 decided on 08.01.2019), and according to the s ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
