9911796707
TMI Blog2021 (10) TMI 1272X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... dated 11.01.2017, whereas in the impugned order of the Tribunal it has been wrongly mentioned that the appeal has been preferred against the order of the Ld. CIT(A)-Shilling dated 11.11.2017 which assertion of assessee, we find to be correct and therefore, this particular fact needs to be rectified and it should be read as appeal numbered as ITA No.108/Gau/2017 was preferred by the assessee again ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... u/2017) - - - Dated:- 1-10-2021 - Shri P.M. Jagtap, Hon ble V.P (KZ) Shri A. T. Varkey, JM For the Appellant : Shri Ashok Kumar Agarwala, FCA. For the Respondent : Shri Anup Chatterjee, Addl. CIT. ORDER VIRTUAL HEARING AT KOLKATA Per Shri A.T. Varkey, JM This Miscellaneous Application has been preferred by the assessee against the order of this Tribunal [SMC Benc ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... . It has also been pointed out by the Ld. AR that the appeal numbered as ITA No.108/Gau/2017 was preferred against the order of the Ld. CIT(A)- 1, Guwahati dated 11.01.2017, whereas in the impugned order of the Tribunal it has been wrongly mentioned that the appeal has been preferred against the order of the Ld. CIT(A)-Shilling dated 11.11.2017 which assertion of assessee, we find to be correct an ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
