TMI Blog2002 (9) TMI 894X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Appellant: A. Jayachandran, DR For Respondents: Parthasarathy and R. Raghavan, Advs. JUDGMENT Jeet Ram Kait, Member (T) 1. In all these 3 appeals common question of law and fact arises and hence they are taken up together for disposal as per law. 2. The question that arises for consideration is about the classification of 'control panels' when cleared alongwith 'i ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... not perform one definite function but perform 2 different functions. In other words, it was contended that the furnace acts as heating mechanism whereas the control panel acts as a mechanism for regulating/supplying the flow of electricity. It was also contended that the provisions of Notification No. 83/92-CE dated 16.9.92 would also be not applicable to control panel inasmuch as the same is not ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ectronics Pvt. Ltd., 2001 (138) ELT 1202 wherein it has been held that batteries supplied alongwith UPS system are required to be classifiable as component of UPS systems and not in its separate heading. (ii) Kumar Traders v. CCE, Calcutta, 2001 (129) ELT 741 wherein also it was held that fan regulators cleared separately and not in combination with fans are classifiable under sub-heading 9414. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e and aerials were classifiable as 85,29. 5. On a careful consideration of the submission we notice that the Commissioner (Appeals) in the impugned order has noticed the function of control panels, which have been designed specifically and are dedicated to the furnace in order to make it a single unit and that the furnace cannot be put to effective use without the particular control panel meant ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|