Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2021 (9) TMI 1330

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... y stood extinguished - Consequently, there is no authority for the 2nd respondent to continue to insist that the properties of the petitioner cannot be alienated, and the request made by the 2nd respondent on 10.11.2014 and 18.03.2015 requesting the 3rd and 4th respondents not to permit registrations cannot operate and would be non est in law. As regards the sole defence of the Revenue department that the subject land is an agricultural land and the person to register the property is the concerned Tahsildar of Farooqnagar and not any of the respondents, the said plea is without any merit. Along with the reply affidavit, the petitioner has filed several documents showing that the petitioner company was manufacturing iron and steel; that .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ion, the petitioner is challenging the inaction of the 2nd respondent in not withdrawing the request for listing of the property of the petitioner situated in Sy. No. 394 of Raikul Village and Sy. Nos. 49/E and 50/E of Annaram Village of Farooqnagar Mandal, Mahaboobnagar in the prohibitory list under Section 22(A) of the Registration Act, 1908 as being illegal and in violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and to consequently declare proceedings Rc. No. MUBD/OA/B3/1/14-15 dated 10.11.2014 and Rc. No. D5/1/2013 dated 18.03.2015 issued by the 2nd respondent as being null and void. 3. The petitioner company was involved in the business of manufacturing iron and steel products. As petitioner was unable to service its deb .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ties were placed in the prohibited list in view of the action initiated by the 2nd respondent under the Telangana Revenue Recovery Act, 1864 for recovery of certain taxes which fell due prior to the initiation of CIRP in respect of the petitioner. 9. The 2nd respondent addressed letter dt. 10.11.2014 requesting the 3rd respondent not to allow any registration in the said properties. He also addressed another letter dt. 18.03.2015 to the 4th respondent on similar lines. 10. The petitioner addressed letter dated 03.06.2020 informing the 4th respondent about the order of NCLT approving the resolution plan and that M/s. Amarsons Pearls and Jewels had taken over the management of the petitioner and requested the SRO, Shadnagar, Ranga Reddy .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... thority, all such claims/dues owed to the State/Central Government or any local authority including tax authorities, which were not part of the resolution plan, shall stand extinguished. 12. Learned Government Pleader for Commercial Tax appearing for the 2nd respondent, however, contended that in the order passed by the NCLT on 06.12.2019 at paragraph 28 it was stated that the resolution plan approved shall not constitute any waiver of any statutory obligations/liabilities arising out of the approved resolution plan and same shall be dealt in accordance with the appropriate authorities as per relevant laws. He therefore contended that the liabilities due to the 2nd respondent have not been waived. 13. He does not, however, dispute tha .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... long with the reply affidavit, the petitioner has filed several documents showing that the petitioner company was manufacturing iron and steel; that there was a factory located in the said property and Exs. P12 to P16 show the existence of the same. Thus the land ceased to be agricultural land long before the introduction of A.P. Agricultural Land (Conversion for Non-Agricultural Purposes) Act, 2006. The Revenue department cannot be blind to the existence of the factory in the subject property and if it had failed to amend its revenue records suitably, it cannot put blame on the petitioner for the same. 17. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is allowed and the request of the 2nd respondent for listing of the property of the petitioner situat .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates