9911796707
TMI Blog2022 (2) TMI 636X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e Customs Act which has been found to be the repository of power to appoint a person to exercise the power under Section 28, according to the petitioners, is not relevant insofar as the Additional Director General of DRI is concerned for the reason that he is actually an officer of Customs. What is more, according to the special leave petition, it is stated that he has been authorised by the Board ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Adv. Ms. Preeti Rani, Adv For the Respondent : Mr. Arshad Hidayatullah, Sr. Adv. Mr. Rupesh Kumar, AOR Ms. Shailja Kher, Adv. Ms. Neelam Sharma, Adv. Ms. Pankhuri Shrivastava, Adv ORDER UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following In this special leave petition, the High Court, in the impugned order, has purported to follow the judgment of this Court reported in Canon I ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ar as the Additional Director General of DRI is concerned for the reason that he is actually an officer of Customs. What is more, according to the special leave petition, it is stated that he has been authorised by the Board within the meaning of Section 2(34). More importantly, however, when questioned in this regard, it is pointed out that Section 28(11) would come to the rescue of the petitione ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
