9911796707
TMI Blog1983 (5) TMI 12X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ng questions of law for the opinion of this court : " 1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was correct in law in holding that the deceased had only 1/4th share in the agricultural holding which alone passed on his death on February 13, 1974 ? 2. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was correct in law in holding that the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... f family settlement. In respect of bonus shares, it was found that although in the meeting held on June 26, 1973, a resolution was passed to allot these shares to the deceased, approval of the Controller was obtained on November 26,1973, and February 7, 1974, but the letter of allotment having been issued on February 15, 1974, two days after the death of the allottee, the value of bonus shares cou ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... he U.P.Z.A. L.R. Act. According to him after the death of Chunni Lal, his son became the sole tenure-holder under s. 171 of the U.P.Z.A. L.R. Act. In his lifetime, neither his mother nor his sons had any right in it. Arid no family settlement could be entered into between persons in whom there was no or there could be no likelihood of dispute. Learned counsel maintained that settlement of disp ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... edges him to be the sole owner, then the antecedent title must be assumed and the family arrangement will be upheld. Therefore, family settlement could be entered into between persons who had some semblance of title. It cannot be disputed that the mother of Sri Garg and his sons did not have any semblance of title. May be it might have been contingent depending on the death of the one or the other ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
