2022 (4) TMI 510

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... G.I. ORDER Heard Mr. B Chakraborty, learned counsel for the petitioner, Ms. A Gayan, learned CGC for the Union of India appearing for respondent no. 1 and Mr. S C Keyal, learned Standing Counsel for the GST Department appearing for respondent no. 2. 2. The adjudicatory order dated 09.02.2022 passed by the Principal Commissioner, GST and Central Excise Commissionerate, Guwahati is an order-in-or .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... against the non-taxability of the said items, confirmed the demand of service tax with cesses amounting to Rs. 8,24,48,561/- (Rupees eight crore twenty four lakh forty eight thousand five hundred sixty one only) for the period from 01.04.2015 to 31.03.2016 and ordered recovery of the same. 4. The tenability or otherwise of grounds on which the said adjudicatory order and demand dated 09.02.2022 h .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... inion that as the provisions of Section 74 of the Finance Act, 1994 provides for rectification of mistake, the ends of justice would be met to permit the petitioner to avail the statutory remedy as provided for under Section 74 of the Finance Act, 1994 by applying for rectification of mistakes, if any. 6. As already indicated hereinbefore, the Court records the objection made by the learned Stand .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X