Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2022 (4) TMI 565

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... and selling and billing of CNG gas, collection of bills etc.. They are receiving Service Charges from M/s Gujarat Gas Co. Ltd. fixed at the rate of per Kg. CNG gas sold in a month subject to a minimum amount of CNG Gas to be sold by them as entered into contract with M/s Gujarat Gas Co. Ltd. On further verification of Bank Statement & ST-3 returns, it was noticed that there was huge difference in taxable value shown in ST-3 returns and amount of service charge received in Bank account. The Appellants submits the reason of difference that the difference is due to reimbursement of electricity charges. A show cause notice was issued for the period 2011-12 to 2015-16 demanding service tax on reimbursement of electricity expenses. The show caus .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the Adjudicating authority in the present case is unlawful and bad in law. Appellant regularly filed ST-3 returns. The assessing officers has failed to follow its duty casted by CBEC Circular No. 113/7/2009-ST dated 23.04.2009. Further, there is decision in favour of appellant in case of VV Brothers (Supra) and also in UOI Vs International Consultant and Technocrats (supra), the appellant is under bona fide belief that return filed in Form ST-3 is correct. Department also conducted the Audit for the period April 2006 to March 2010 and accepted the ST-3 returns. Therefore, there is no fraud, no mis-statement, no suppression of facts, hence extended period not invokable. He relied upon the following Judgments: * Uniworth Textiles Ltd. Vs. C .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... g identically placed service provider and the same service recipient M/s. Gujarat Gas Company Limited under the identical contract has been decided by this Tribunal in the case of V V Brothers (Supra) wherein this Tribunal has passed the following order:- "This appeal has been filed by M/s VV Brothers against order of Commissioner (Appeals) confirming the demand of Service Tax. 2. Learned Chartered Accountant for the appellant pointed out that they are engaged in providing services to M/s Gujarat Gas. They have entered into an agreement with Gujarat Gas in terms of which they were being paid an amount of fixed charges and reimbursement for the electricity charges paid by them to Electricity Company. In terms of the contract a separate e .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... a Services Pvt. Ltd. vs. CCE, Pune-iii 2016 (43) STR 622 (TriMum.) (4) Dream Loanz vs. Commr. of Central Excise, Coimbatore 2017(6) GSTL 443 (Tri Chennai) (5) AdhikrutJabti Evam Vasuli vs. CCE (Indore) 2017 (6) GSTL 529 (Tri- Delhi) 3. Learned Authorised Representative relied on the impugned order. He argued that in the case of decision of larger bench in the case of Sri Bhagwathy Traders 2011 (24) S.T.R. 290 (Tri-LB) which has been held that only when the amount is spent in the capacity of pure agent, the same can be excluded from the assessable value. He argued that since in the instant case, amount is not paid in the capacity of pure agent, the amount is includable in the assessable value. 4. We have considered rival submission. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... in gross value of renting of immovable property service. We find that the said principle is equally applicable in the instant case. The said principle has also been pronounced by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Intercontinental Consultants and Technocrats Pvt. Ltd. 2018 (10) G.S.T.L 401 (SC). Accordingly, the appeal is allowed." 4.1 From the above decision of this Tribunal, it can be seen that the electricity charges which is reimbursed on actual basis in terms of the contract is not includible in the gross value of service provided by the appellant to Gujarat Gas Company Limited. 5. Accordingly, the issue is no longer res Integra. Hence, the impugned order is set aside, appeals are allowed. 4.3 In view of the above judgments, the is .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates