9911796707
TMI Blog2022 (4) TMI 824X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... at, AAG, Punjab, Mr. Saurabh Goel, Advocate and Mr. Tej Bahadur, Advocate for respondent No. 2. ***** GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J. 1. The petitioners seek grant of regular bail in proceedings initiated by Superintendent (Anti-Evasion) CGST, Commissionerate Ludhiana under Section 132 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') read with Section 20 of the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... B Sunil Kumar (his own firm) 2. M/s Ashutosh Steels 03CTSPK6268F1ZC Mandeep Kaur (employee of Sunil Kumar) 3. M/s Samridhi Steel 03AHZPC4834A1ZM Raman Kumar Chopra (employee of Sunil Kumar) 4. M/s Muskan Enterprises 03CHYPC6098K1ZO Diviya Chopra (wife of Raman Kumar Chopra) 5. M/s DK Enterprises 03GJBPK1517G1ZP Davinder Kaur (ex-employee of Sunil Kumar) 6. M/s Chadha St ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 7. M/s Chadha Steels Asha (his wife) 5,15,00,394/- TOTAL ITC 31,48,04,523/- 4. The learned counsel for the petitioners have submitted that it is the case of the complainant that the accused had created bogus firms in their own names or in the names of members of their families, employees and members of their families and that all the three petitioners, who ar ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... of the fact that they are ladies and Section 439 Cr.P.C. itself recognizes that a lenient view may be taken in the matter of grant of bail to the ladies and infirm persons 5. On the other hand, the learned counsel representing respondent No. 2 has opposed the petition on the ground that it is a case where a colossal amount of Rs. 31,48,04,523/- has been siphoned off from the State exchequ ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
