Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2022 (4) TMI 1241

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... tioner appears to have replied for the same by reply dated 09.03.2020 and thereafter, proceeded to file W.P.No.12667 of 2020 to quash the aforesaid demand notice dated 04.03.2020. 3. The petitioner's Writ Petition along with a batch of Writ Petitions came to be disposed by a common order dated 29.09.2020 by a learned Single Judge of this Court. The Writ Petition was disposed by directing the respondents to issue appropriate order to recompute the amount of interest liability for delayed payment of cash and refund the balance of amount. The operative portion of the order reads as follows: "In W.P.No.12492 of 2020, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the interest liability relating to belated payment of tax both by cash and reversal of ITC has been coercively recovered. In light of my decision as aforesaid, a direction is issued to the appropriate authority to compute the interest liability for belated remittances of cash and refund the balance of the amount collected from the petitioner within a period of four weeks from date of uploading of this order." 4. While passing the above order, the learned Single Judge referred to the GST Councils Meeting on 21.06.2019 a .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... al GST Authorities levying interest on tax paid by reversal of ITC. In one matter alone, the challenge is to recovery taken under the Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (TNGST Act). Learned Special Government Pleader would adopt the submissions of the Central authorities and state that the position of the State Government is in line with the view expressed by the Centre in press release dated 26.08.2020. 14. It is thus clear that there is a meeting of minds of the Centre, the State of Tamil Nadu and the Board to the effect that the proviso to Section 50 is operative effective 01.07.2017, and no interest is liable to be levied on tax remitted by reversal of available ITC. 15. While this is so, the GST authorities have adopted a contradictory stand by issuing orders, styled as notices, levying interest for allegedly belated remittance of tax by reversal of ITC. No opportunity appears to have been granted in most of the matters calling for explanation from the assessees prior to raising of the impugned demands of interest and coercive recovery action by attachment of bank accounts have been resorted to by the respective Assessing Officers. ..... ..... 22. Thus, notw .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 29. The Board has, in my view, extended a waiver of recovery for the past period in line with the decisions of the Council (vi) Notification dated 18.09.2020, that cemented the long line of assurances of the GST Council and the Board in letter and spirit. While promising that the amendment in question will be clarified to be retrospective, the Board has indicated certain difficulties in carrying out the stated amendment at this juncture. I would be loath to speculate on the nature of the difficulties expressed and restrict myself to concluding that the sequence of events that I have set out above make it more than amply clear to me that the present writ petitions are liable to be allowed." 6.The petitioner has now approached this Court once again and has challenged the impugned communication asking the petitioner to pay a sum of Rs. 7,48,190/- being the delayed payment of tax by cash for the period between July 2017 to October 2020. 7.The learned counsel for the respondent submits that in the light of the stay obtained by the petitioner, the respondents are unable to recover the amount. The learned counsel for the respondent also placed reliance on the order passed by a learned S .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... .e.f., 30.10.2018. Rules 142A reads as follows:- "142A. Procedure for recovery of dues under existing laws. - (1) A summary of order issued under any of the existing laws creating demand of tax, interest, penalty, fee or any other dues which becomes recoverable consequent to proceedings launched under the existing law before, on or after the appointed day shall, unless recovered under that law, be recovered under the Act and may be uploaded in FORM GST DRC 07A electronically on the common portal for recovery under the Act and the demand of the order shall be posted in Part II of Electronic Liability Register in FORM GST PMT 01. (2) Where the demand of an order uploaded under sub-rule (1) is rectified or modified or quashed in any proceedings, including in appeal, review or revision, or the recovery is made under the existing laws, a summary thereof shall be uploaded on the common portal in FORM GST DRC 08A and Part II of Electronic Liability Register in FORM GST PMT 01 shall be updated accordingly." 10. As far as the reversal of Input Tax Credit wrongly availed and for payment of interest is concerned, the substantive provisions are under Rule 37(3) & (4) of CGST Rules, 2017 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... rt had earlier considered the issue relating to recovery of interest on account of reversal of input tax credit. The batch was disposed by the Court by its common order along with W.P.No. 12667 of 2020 filed by the Petitioner by oversight as the interest liability of the petitioner was not on account of reversal of ITC. There is also no indication interest liability arose any reversal of input tax credit on the petitioner. 15. On the other hand, interest has been demanded on the net tax liability of the petitioner on account of belated payment of tax during the aforesaid period under Section 50(1) of the CGST Act, 2017. 16. Since tax was paid by the petitioner belatedly, petitioner is liable to interest during the period default. There was no excuse for not paying the tax in time from its electronic cash register. Nothing precluded the petitioner from discharging the tax liability from its electronic credit. 17. If there is a belated payment of tax declared in the returns filed, interest has to follow. The petitioner has to pay the interest on the belated payment of tax and as has been demanded. Even where there is a failure to file returns or circumstances specified under Secti .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates