TMI Blog2021 (9) TMI 1396X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ry of accommodation entries without carrying on any further investigation. We note that the statement taken during the course of search has been retracted in which it has been admitted that Bhanwarlal Jain and related entities were engaged in accommodation entries in the form of unsecured loans of short term and long term capital gain and share capital etc. We also observe from the facts before us that the assessee has filed various evidences before the lower authorities however no further enquiries have been conducted by the AO or ld CIT(A) to dig out the truth or t disapprove the evidences filed. Both the authorities below have heavily relied on the statements recorded during search of Shri Bhanwar lal Lain and other persons without any corroborating evidences. - Decided in favour of assessee. - ITA Nos.278, 279, 280, 281 & 282/M/2020 - - - Dated:- 8-9-2021 - SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI RAVISH SOOD, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessee by : Shri Jain Dixit, A.R. Revenue by : Ms. Shreekala Pardesh, D.R. O R D E R Per Rajesh Kumar, Accountant Member: The above titled appeals have been preferred by the assessee against the orders dated 24.10.201 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... brief are that the assessee filed return of income on 27.09.2008 declaring income of Rs.1,66,15,683/-. The assessment was framed under section 143(3) vide order dated 28.10.2010 accepting the return of income. Thereafter, the case of the assessee was reopened and one more assessment was framed under section 143(3) read with section 147 of the Act assessing the total income at Rs.2,07,76,523/- vide order dated 24.03.2014. Thereafter, the AO received information from the DGIT (Inv.) Mumbai that assessee is beneficiary of accommodation entries. Accordingly, the AO after recording the reason under section 148(2) of the Act reopened the assessment by issuing notice dated 25.03.2015 which were duly served upon the assessee. The assessee complied with the notice vide letter dated 20.04.2015 by submitting that return filed originally may be treated as filed in compliance to this notice. In the reason recorded the AO noted that in the books of accounts of the assessee unsecured loans aggregating to Rs.1,00,00,000/- were credited in the books of accounts of the assessee which were raised from four parties namely Ankita Exports, Megha Gems, Malhar Gems and Milan Co. all belonging to Bhanwa ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... dation entries without doing any real business which has affirmed by Ld. CIT(A) by observing that retraction of statement recorded during the course under section 132(4) of the Act can not be sole basis to treat the transaction as genuine. Undisputedly, the assessee during the course of assessment proceedings filed copy of ITRs, balance sheet, profit and loss account, confirmations and proof of receipt of payment through banking channel along with the evidence of payment of interest at the rate of 12% after deduction of TDS at source. We observe from the records before us that AO has not carried out any further verification and relied on the report of the DGIT(Inv.), Mumbai that assessee is beneficiary of accommodation entries without carrying on any further investigation. We note that the statement taken during the course of search has been retracted in which it has been admitted that Bhanwarlal Jain and related entities were engaged in accommodation entries in the form of unsecured loans of short term and long term capital gain and share capital etc. We also observe from the facts before us that the assessee has filed various evidences before the lower authorities however no furt ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... t payment to those unsecured loans is not sacrosanct because all these shell companies/hawala operators would keep necessary paper document in order to give colour of genuineness to their transactions. Therefore, he opined that the transactions between the parties are failed to pass the test of genuineness and accordingly made additions u/s 68 of the Act. 12. The provisions of section 68 of the Act deals with the cases, where any sum found credited in the books of account of the assessee in any Financial Year, and the assessee offers no explanation about the nature and source thereof or explanation offered by the assessee is not in the opinion of the AO satisfactory, then the sum so credited may be charged to income tax as the income of the assessee of that previous year. A plain reading of section 68 makes it very clear that in order to fix any credit within the ambit of section 68 of the Act, the AO needs to examine three ingredients i.e. identity, genuineness of transactions and creditworthiness of the parties. If the assessee proves all ingredients provided u/s 68 of the Act, then the onus shifts to the AO to prove otherwise. In this legal background, if you examine the iden ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... so, let us examine what is the basis for the AO to arrive at conclusion that the transactions between the parties are not genuine and which are hit by the provisions of section 68 of the Act. The AO never brought out any further facts to link credits found in the books of accounts of the assessee to the evidences found during the course of search in the case of Shri Bhanwaral Jain except statement of Shri Bhanwaral Jain. Even during the course of survey in group cases of assessee, no incriminating material was found which can be linked to evidences collected during the course of search in case of Shri Bhanwarlal Jain. Further, during the course of survey in assessee s group cases, the directors and employees have categorically admitted that they have personally visited office of Shri Bhanwarlal Jain Group Companies for arranging loans. The AO did not controvert this fact by bringing any other evidences. On the other hand, the assessee has filed complete details including confirmations from loan creditors, their PAN details, master data, affidavit from the directors/partners/proprietors of those companies, income tax acknowledgments receipts along with financial statements, bank sta ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... tors received money as share application, then, it cannot be termed as bogus . The controversy is covered by the judgements rendered b y the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Lovely Exports Pvt Ltd, vs. CIT, (2008) 216 CTR (SC) 195, as also by this Court in CIT vs. Creative World Tele films Ltd, (2011) 333 ITR 100 (Bom). In such circumstances, we are of the view that the Tribunal's finding that there is no justification in the addition made under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act,, 1961 neither suffers from any perversity nor gives rise to any substantial question of law. CIT vs. Creative World Tele films Ltd (2011) 333 ITR 100 (Born-High Court) The question sought to be raised in the appeal was also raised before the Tribunal and the Tribunal was pleased to follow the judgment of the apex Court in the case of CIT vs. Lovely Exports (P) Ltd. (2008) 216 CTR (SC) 195. wherein the apex Court observed that if the share application money is received by the assessee-company from alleged bogus shareholders, w hose names are given to the AO, then the Department can always proceed against them and if necessary reopen their individual assessments. In the case in hand, i ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... al contributed by the shareholders. Accordingly CIT(A) and the Tribunal has not committed any illegality in allowing the appeal of the assessee. We do not find any illegality in the judgment of the CIT(A) and the Tribunal. CIT vs. JayDee Securities Finance Ltd (2013) 32 Taxmann.com91 (AllHigh Court) The Tribunal recorded findings that the assessee had produced the return of income filed by the relevant shareholders who had paid share application money. The assessee had also produced the confirmation of share holders indicating the details of addresses, PAN and particulars of cheques through which the amount was paid towards the share application money. The Tribunal thereafter relied upon the judgment of the Supreme Court in CIT V. Lovely Exports (P.) Ltd wherein it was held that if the assessee produces the names, addresses, PAN details of the share holders then the onus on the assessee to prove the source o f share application money stands discharged. If the Assessing Authority was not satisfied with the creditworthiness of the shareholders, it was open to the Assessing Authority to verify the same in the hands of the shareholders concerned, The Tribunal has relied up ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the hands of the creditors or sub- creditors. CIT vs. Al Anam Agro Foods (P.) Ltd (2013) 38 Taxmann.com 375 (All High Court) Tribunal, however , held that since identity of shareholders stood proved on record, amount of share application money could not be added to income of assessee. According to Tribunal, in such a case amount could be taxed in hands of persons who had invested CIT vs. Dwarkadhish Investment (P) Ltd (2011) 330 ITR 298 (Del-High Court) Just because the creditors/share applicants could not be found at the address given, it would not give the Revenue the right to invoke s. 68- Revenue has all the power and wherewithal to trace any person- Moreover, it is settled law that the assessee need not to prove the 'source of source'- In the instant case, the Tribunal has confirmed the order of the CIT(A) deleting the impugned addition holding t hat the assessee has been able to prove the identity of the share applicants and the share application money has been received by way of account payee cheques. CIT vs. Namastey Chemicals Pvt Ltd (2013) 33 Taxmann.com271 (GujHigh Court) In the present case also, the respondent assessee has recei ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... f the both these authorities, who had concurrently held the due details having been proved. The assessee company had presented the necessary worth proof before both the authorities and it was not expected by the assessee company to further prove the source of the deceased. CIT vs. Nikunj Eximp Enterprises (P.) Ltd (2013) 35 Taxrnann.com384 (Bom) Whether merely because suppliers had not appeared before Assessing Officer or Commissioner (Appeals), it cou ld not be concluded that purchases were not made by assessee - Held, Yes.... Further, there were confirmation letters filed by the suppliers, copies of invoices for purchases as well as copies of bank statement all of which would indicate that the purchases were in fact made. In our view, merely because the suppliers have not appeared before the Assessing Officer or the CIT(A), one cannot conclude that the purchases were not made by the respondent- assessee CIT vs. Samir Bio- Tech Pvt Ltd (2010) 325 ITR 294 (Del-High Court) Identities of the subscribers are not in doubt. The transactions have also been undertaken through banking channels inasmuch as the application money for the shares was given through account ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... in. The relevant findings of the Tribunal are as under:- 3. I have considered the rival submissions and perused the material available on record. The facts in brief are that the assessee an individual engaged in the business of builder and developer declared loss of Rs. 1,29,68,736 in his return on 15.09.2009. The assessment was completed u/s 143(3) of the Act on 30.11.2011 assessing the loss at Rs. 1,13,73,448. The assessee carried the matter in appeal before the learned CIT(A) wherein vide order dated 03.02.2014, part relief was granted to the assessee. Later on, the case of the assessee was reopened u/s 147 on the basis of information that the assessee has received accommodation entry of unsecured loan from M/s. Laxmi Trading Company, M/s. Mouli Gems, M/s. Minal Gems, M/s. Naman Exports and M/s. Prime Star, pertaining to Bhawarlal Jain Group. As per the assessee, during the assessment proceedings, documentary evidences pertaining to loan from aforementioned parties like confirmation, bank statement and acknowledgment of return of income of loan, bank statement of the assessee reflecting the amounts and genuineness of transactions were filed. However, the learned Assessing Of ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... eas, the learned Counsel for the assessee invited my attention to the finding recorded in Para-6.1 of the impugned order. On a perusal of record and the assertions made by the respective Counsels. There is a finding in the impugned order that the assessee duly produced the bank statement from where interests were paid also copies of form no.16A evidencing the TDS made and deposited into the Government account with respect to payment of interest. Since in earlier paras of this order since I have upheld the order of the learned CIT(A), therefore, the issue of interest is consequential in nature, therefore, the conclusion drawn in the impugned order is upheld. 17. Coming to the cases relied upon by the Ld. DR in light of various case laws discussed by the AO as well as the Ld. CIT(A). We have considered the cases relied upon by the Ld. DR as well as the Ld. CIT(A) in light of facts of present case and we found that the case laws considered by lower authorities were rendered under different set of facts which cannot be applied to the facts of the present case. Accordingly, the cases relied upon by the Ld. DR are rejected. 18. In this view of the matter and considering the ratio ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... credits is placed upon the shoulders of the assessee. It has been held by Honourable Courts that the initial burden shall be discharged, if the assessee proves three main ingredients, viz., the identity of the creditor, the creditworthiness of the creditor and genuineness of the transactions. If the assessee has discharged the initial onus, then the onus to disprove the same is shifted to the shoulders of the assessing officer. These legal principles have been reiterated in the cases of Bhan sons (supra) and M/s Precision Finance P Ltd (supra), which were referred to by Ld CIT-DR. In the instant case, there is no dispute that the assessee has discharged the initial burden of proof placed upon it by furnishing all the materials to prove the three main ingredients, referred above. Hence the burden has shifted to the shoulders of the assessing officer to disprove the evidences furnished by the assessee. We notice that the assessing officer, in the instant case, did not conduct further enquiries or bring any material on record to discharge the burden shifted upon his shoulders. Instead, we notice that the assessing officer has simply placed reliance on the alleged incriminating mater ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... l evidences furnished by the assessee to prove the cash credits? The various evidences furnished by the assessee, in fact, disprove the inferences drawn by the search officials. When the assessing officer could not disprove the material evidences furnished by the assessee, in our view, he is not entitled to place full reliance on the inferences drawn by the search officials, particularly the assessee could rebut those presumptions drawn by the search officials. Though the sworn statement given by Shri Bhanwarlal Jain may be a relevant piece of evidence, yet it is stated that the said statement has been retracted. Further the AO has not shown that the transactions entered by the assessee with the group of Shri Bhanwarlal Jain were examined by the search officials and he has deposed against the transactions entered between him and the assessee. On the contrary, the Ld CIT(A) has given a finding that the impugned loan transactions have not been specifically stated to be bogus in nature. The key person of the assessee has reiterated in his statement taken from him during the course of survey that the loan transactions are genuine. When it was pointed out that Shri Bhanwarlal Jain has a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... y furnishing all the relevant details available with it. In the case of Orissa Corporation P Ltd (supra), the assessee furnished available details and then requested the AO to issue summons to the creditors, since it could not collect further details from them. The AO failed to do so and hence the Hon ble Supreme Court held that the addition made u/s 68 is not justified. The assessee herein, in our view, stand on a stronger footing. The assessee has furnished all the relevant details, which has been summarized by the Ld CIT(A) in paragraph 6.3.31 of his order as under:- 6.3.31 In the case before me, the record also shows that to prove the genuineness of the impugned loan entries from the 17 creditors, the appellant has furnished to the Assessing Officer the following details copies of which were also furnished in the present proceedings: I. PAN details of creditors II. Constitution and address of the creditors III. Particulars of income-tax returns filed by the creditors [These show that the creditors are legitimate business entities, having the ability to advance the impugned loans to the appellant.] IV. Confirmatory letters given by the creditors V. Audited f ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|