TMI Blog2020 (1) TMI 1590X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... iew - HELD THAT:- As per the order in ABISHEK MUNDHRA VERSUS THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (ADJUDICATION-AIR) , O/O. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS COMMISSIONARATE, CHENNAI 1 (AIRPORT) , NEW CUSTOMS HOUSE, MEENAMBAKKAM, CHENNAI [ 2019 (8) TMI 1823 - MADRAS HIGH COURT] , came to be disposed of on 19.08.2019, the respondent was directed to pass appropriate orders within a period of thr ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ondent : Mr. S.Rajasekar Standing Counsel O R D E R The petitioner has challenged the impugned order in order originally passed by the Joint Commissioner of Customs (Adjudication- AIR) in the order in original No. 95/17/02/2015, dated 17.02.2015. The same order was challenged by the main noticee in W.P. No. 10813/2015. The said writ petition came to be disposed of on 19.08.2019, with th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... t was directed to pass appropriate orders within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the copy. However, due to filing of the present writ petition, the respondent has been unable to take up the proceedings. It is to be noted that by order dated 19.08.2019 in W.P.No.10816 of 2015, the impugned order dated 17/02/2015 has been set aside and the case has been remanded back for fresh c ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|