9911796707
TMI Blog2022 (2) TMI 1276X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... t - HELD THAT:- The remedy of the petitioner to challenge the sale is either before the DRT or DRAT, which remedy petitioner has already initiated and admittedly there is no interim protection granted to the petitioner. Thus, petitioner cannot approach this Court by seeking to invoke Article 226 of the Constitution of India to indirectly seek the same relief which petitioner has failed to get fro ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Petitioner : Mr. M.P.S.Kasana, Advocate. For the Respondent : Ms. Puja Kalra, Standing Counsel, North DMC with Mr. Virendra Singh, Advocate for R-1. Mr. Gurmeet Singh, Advocate for R-6. JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL) 1. The hearing was conducted through video conferencing. 2. Petitioner seeks quashing of sanction letter dated 02.07.2021 whereby a building plan ha ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ment of Security Interest Act, 2002 by the financial Institution and pursuant thereto subject property was sold in a Court auction. Said property was purchased by respondent Nos.2 to 4. A sale certificate is also alleged to have been issued in their favour. 5. Petitioner has filed an application before the DRT and initiated proceedings before the DRAT impugning the said sale. However as per lea ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... d and admittedly there is no interim protection granted to the petitioner. Thus, petitioner cannot approach this Court by seeking to invoke Article 226 of the Constitution of India to indirectly seek the same relief which petitioner has failed to get from DRT and DRAT. 9. Further, the contention of the petitioner that representation of the petitioner given to the Deputy Commissioner, North Delh ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
