2008 (7) TMI 30

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ent. [Order Per: Mr. B.S.V. Murthy, Member (Technical)]- Revenue has filed this appeal against Order-in-Appeal No.ID/11/Daman /2007, dt.28.9.07, wherein the Commissioner (Appeals) reduced the penalty under Section 77 to Rs.1,000/- and did not interfere with the penalty of Rs.1,45,000/- imposed under Section 76 and Rs.1,000/- under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1944. The case against the appellan .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... rized representative who was deputed by them. 3. It is noticed that the department had filed cross objection with Commissioner (Appeals) on 27.4.07 and raised issues which have been placed before this Tribunal in this appeal.  However, it is noticed that the Commissioner (Appeals) has not at all discussed or taken note of the cross objection filed by the department while passing the order. R .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X