9911796707
TMI Blog2022 (11) TMI 678X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... s proprietor could have done was to furnish reasons for his inability to appear and supply the copies of the documents sought by the concerned authority. Ms Anjali J. Manish, who appears on behalf of the petitioner, says that several agencies, who are investigating the applicant/petitioner have been furnished copies of the documents - this is not a good enough reason to avoid furnishing docume ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the nonapplicants/respondents. 3. Mr Singla says that he does not wish to file a reply in the matter. 4. Given the statement made by Mr Singla, the prayer made in the application is allowed. 5. However, Mr Singla does advert to one aspect, that is there has been no compliance of the summon dated 14.09.2022. [See Annexure P-63, appended on PDF page 337 of the case file]. 5.1 This summo ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... spondence with the concerned authority, who had issued the summons to the petitioner on this aspect. 8. This approach of the petitioner is unacceptable. 8.1 The least that the petitioner concern s proprietor could have done was to furnish reasons for his inability to appear and supply the copies of the documents sought by the concerned authority. 9. Ms Anjali J. Manish, who appears on beh ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
