2022 (12) TMI 473

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Mr. Priyojeet Chatterjee, Advs. Respondents: Ms. Pratima N. Lakra, Adv., Mr. Harpreet Singh & Ms. Suhani Mathur, Advs. ORDER CM No.52296/2022 (for exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2. The application is disposed of. W.P.(C) 16613/2022 3. The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, praying as under: "(a) This Hon'ble Court be pleased to issue appro .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... onnecting customers to other taxi operators. According to the petitioner, it receives commission on the gross amount receive by various taxi operators. 5. There appears to be no dispute that the petitioner has deposited the service tax in respect of the commission received. 6. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states that the limited controversy is whether the petitioner was liabl .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states that during the previous two years, the petitioner could hardly generate any revenue; in fact, the petitioner has suffered huge losses and therefore today is not in a position to make the mandatory pre-deposit quantified at Rs.1.45 crores for filing an appeal before the Customs, Excise and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT). The insist .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X