9911796707
TMI Blog2022 (12) TMI 858X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... yet this Court finds that a Coordinate Bench of this Court in PCIT vs. Smt. Krishna Devi [ 2021 (1) TMI 1008 - DELHI HIGH COURT] connected ITAs has upheld the ITAT order which is impugned in the present appeal. ITAT, being the last fact-finding authority, on the basis of the evidence brought on record, has rightly come to the conclusion that the lower tax authorities are not able to sustain the addition without any cogent material on record. We thus find no perversity in the Impugned Order - no substantial question of law arises. - HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN AND HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA For the Appellant : Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Sr.Standing Counsel with Mr.Vipul Agrawal and Mr.Parth Semwal, Jr. St ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... IT vs. Smt. Krishna Devi (supra) is reproduced hereinbelow:- 11. On a perusal of the record, it is easily discernible that in the instant case, the AO had proceeded predominantly on the basis of the analysis of the financials of M/s Gold Line International Finvest Limited. His conclusion and findings against the Respondent are chiefly on the strength of the astounding 4849.2% jump in share prices of the aforesaid company within a span of two years, which is not supported by the financials. On an analysis of the data obtained from the websites, the AO observes that the quantum leap in the share price is not justified; the trade pattern of the aforesaid company did not move along with the sensex; and the financials of the company did not ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... transactions were accommodation entries, and thus, fictitious. The conclusion drawn by the AO, that there was an agreement to convert unaccounted money by taking fictitious LTCG in a pre-planned manner, is therefore entirely unsupported by any material on record. This finding is thus purely an assumption based on conjecture made by the AO. This flawed approach forms the reason for the learned ITAT to interfere with the findings of the lower tax authorities. The learned ITAT after considering the entire conspectus of case and the evidence brought on record, held that the Respondent had successfully discharged the initial onus cast upon it under the provisions of Section 68 of the Act. It is recorded that There is no dispute that the shares ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e general in nature and later in the order, the CIT(A) itself notes that the broker did not respond to the notices. Be that as it may, the CIT(A) has only approved the order of the AO, following the same reasoning, and relying upon the report of the Investigation Wing. Lastly, reliance placed by the Revenue on Suman Poddar v. ITO (supra) and Sumati Dayal v. CIT (supra) is of no assistance. Upon examining the judgment of Suman Poddar (supra) at length, we find that the decision therein was arrived at in light of the peculiar facts and circumstances demonstrated before the ITAT and the Court, such as, inter alia, lack of evidence produced by the Assessee therein to show actual sale of shares in that case. On such basis, the ITAT had returned ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
