TMI Blog2018 (11) TMI 1941X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... by this Tribunal in appellant s own case while entertaining the claim of remission of duty by this Tribunal in PARK NONWOVENS PVT. LTD. VERSUS CCE, DELHI-III [ 2017 (3) TMI 1923 - CESTAT DELHI] wherein it has been held that the appellant is not required to reverse the cenvat credit contained in work in progress finished goods and semi finished goods. Taking note that the said order which has been ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... lized. Therefore, the ld. Commissioner (A) is directed to take care in future to avoid any penal action from this Tribunal. The impugned order is set aside. The appeal is allowed. X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... h lost in fire. The matter was adjudicated and cenvat credit on inputs sought to be recovered in semi finished goods lost in fire by way of impugned order. Against the said order, the appellant is before me. 3. Heard the parties and considered the submissions. 4. Considering the fact that the said issue has already been settled by this Tribunal in appellant's own case while entertaining the clai ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ot given any regard to the Tribunal's orders imposed a fine of Rs. 1 Lac on the Ld. Commissioner (A). In that circumstances, the Commissioner (A) has not respected the order of this Tribunal required to be penalized. Therefore, the ld. Commissioner (A) is directed to take care in future to avoid any penal action from this Tribunal. 5. In view of the above, the impugned order is set aside. The app ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|