2023 (7) TMI 1185

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Mr. Justice Abhay S. OKA For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. K. V. Viswanathan, Sr. Adv., Mr. Nakul Dewan, Sr. Adv., Mr. Anirban Bhattacharya, Adv., Mr. Ativ Patel, Adv., Ms. Priyanka Vora, Adv., Mr. Siddhant Buxy, AOR, Mr. Krishna Sumanth, Adv., Mr. Darshit Dave, Adv. And Mr. Sivagnanam K, Adv. For the Respondent(s) : Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, Sr. Adv., Mr. Parag P. Tripathi, Sr. Adv., Mr. Mahesh Agarwal, Adv .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nal order of Division Bench alleging that they were not parties in those proceedings and some observations have been made in paras 13 to 15 of that order which affected the pending litigation relating to respondent No.1. In that context, it was observed that if that was so, it was for the petitioner to approach the High Court to seek appropriate relief and the SLP was dismissed with that liberty. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ld on account of mis-disclosure of facts for seeking condonation of delay, albeit of a short period. What has been sought to be pointed out is that the ignorance expressed about the order passed in the review petition is false as it was well known to the appellant in view of the proceedings in the appeal before the NCLAT, inter alia, as recorded in the order dated 22.8.2022 in presence of their co .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X