2023 (10) TMI 1117

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... :- After having gone through the order under review, it is obvious that this Court has considered the aspect in detail in para 5.1 and has taken a conscious decision against the petitioner which may be erroneous but cannot thus be termed as palpably erroneous. As regards non consideration of the Bombay High Court Judgment in case of A.C. Nielsen Research Services Private Limited vs. Union of In .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ition in question which centers around the correct interpretation of Section 128 of SVLDRS Scheme, was dismissed. Learned counsel for review petitioner has pointed out that view taken by the Court is palpably erroneous for the reason that Bombay High Court Judgment in case of A.C. Nielsen Research Services Private Limited vs. Union of India passed in W.P. No. 6716 of 2022 dated 16.11.2022 w .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X