9911796707
TMI Blog2009 (7) TMI 78X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ing vide letter dated 2.1.2007 – No response from department side to letter dated 2.1.2007 – Ex party order was passed on 18.1.2007 – Held that – in view of subsequent events - the proceedings for transfer of the file of the appellant from Kanpur to Delhi, for the purpose of centralising the cases for coordinated investigation and meaningful assessment has become infructuous. In this view of the m ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... or payment to public servants. By a notice dated 10.11.2006, the appellant was directed to attend the office of the Commissioner of Income Tax, stating: "As per result of search seizure operation u/s. 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1951 in the case of the above mentioned group conducted on 14.02.2006, the Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi (Central- III), New Delhi vide his letter F. NO.CIT(C-II) ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... he notice. (5) That without prejudice to the submissions made above and reserving our right of natural and legal justice, we categorically state here that we have our head office at Kanpur factory at adjoining District at Unnao. We have no business or other transactions at New Delhi. Our directors are also residing at Kanpur and Unnao. There is no person at New Delhi to look after any proceedin ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ly paid by the Association has been held to be added as an unexplained amount in the assessment of M/s. Radico Khaitan Ltd. It has further been stated that M/s. Radico Khaitan Ltd. had also filed an application before the Settlement Commission and the order passed therein in favour of M/s. Radico Khaitan Ltd. is the subject matter of challenge before the Delhi High Court, at the instance of the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
