2009 (9) TMI 48

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... or the respondent. [Order per: Dr. Chittaranjan Satapathy, Technical Member] - Heard both sides. Shri V.S. Manoj, Ld. Advocate, appearing for the appellants states that the demand of service tax for the period April-03 to March-06 is time barred as the information was available with the department subsequent to the departmental audit of the appellant's records.  He further states that the ta .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nancial Services Ltd. Vs. CST, Chennai, - Stay Order No. 328/09 dated 30.04.09. 3. We find that the period in dispute is from 10.09.04 to 30.09.07.  The appellants had not furnished the details of pre-closure charges to the department till audit by the departmental officers and further correspondence with the appellants.  Hence, prima facie we are of the view that the department is just .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X