Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2023 (12) TMI 935

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... mus/ certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction quashing the impugned notice dated 19.07.2018 issued by Respondent No. 1, seeking to revive/ reinitiate/ continue the already time-barred set-aside assessment proceedings in the case of the Petitioner for assessment years 1998-99 to 2009-10, as void ab initio and patently illegal; (B) declare the pending set-aside assessment proceedings for assessment years 1998-99 to 2009-10 in the case of Petitioner, pursuant to the appellate orders of the Tribunal dated 21.11.2014 and 29.05.2015, as barred by limitation in terms of section 153 of the Act; (C) issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the Respondents to accept t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... entioned AYs, and accordingly separate assessment orders were framed under Section 143(3) of the Act. 5. The record discloses that insofar as AY 1998-99 to AY 2002-03 were concerned, the matters were carried in appeal by the revenue on certain aspects to this court. This court passed a combined order dated 21.10.2011 concerning appeals preferred vis-a-vis the AYs referred to hereinabove. 5.1 Via the said order, the court set aside the impugned orders and remanded the matter to the Tribunal for a fresh consideration. Upon remand by this court, the Tribunal via order dated 21.11.2014 in turn remitted the matter to the AO, not only concerning AY 1998-99 to AY 2002-03, but also for AY 2003-04 to AY 2009-10. 6. The record further discloses t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... answer the queries with respect to the AYs in issue, i.e., AY 1998-99 to AY 2009-10. The petitioner was also directed to produce the relevant documents/accounts and other evidence in support of its stand. 9. The issuance of this notice propelled the petitioner to address communications dated 25.07.2018 and 02.08.2018 to the AO. In these communications, the petitioner took the stand that the limitation for passing assessment order had expired. 9.1 Since the AO did not drop the proceedings and accepted the income as declared by the petitioner in its return, the petitioner was constrained to move this court by way of the instant writ petition. As noted right at the outset, the writ petition came up for hearing before this court on 08.08.2018 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... der dated 29.05.2015 [Appeals arising out of order passed under section 143(3)/263 for Assessment Year 2003-04] If the order of the Tribunal was received on or before 31.03.2015 31.03.2016 [As per sub-section (2A) of section 153, existing Prior to Finance Act, 2016 - within 1 year from the end of the FY in which the order is received] NOT APPLICABLE (Since order was passed on 29.05.2015) If the order of the Tribunal was received on or after 01.04.2015 but on or before 31.03.2016 Old Limit - 31.03.2017 [As per sub-section (2A) of section 153, existing prior to Finance Act, 2016 - within 1 war from the end of the FY in which the order is received] New Limit - 31.12.2016 [As per sub-section (3) of section 153, after Finance Act, .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ich is the old provision], the limitation would expire on 31.03.2018. However, if the amended provision, i.e., Section 153(3) of the Act were to be taken into account, the limitation would expire on 31.03.2017. It is also not disputed that this aspect of the matter is covered by the judgments of the coordinate bench rendered in Nokia India (P.) Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, [2017] 291 Taxman 85 (Delhi) and Aricent Technologies (Holdings) Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr., 2023/DHC/001521. 17. Thus, whichever regime we take into account, i.e., the time limit fixed as per Section 153(2)(A) of the Act or the time limit fixed by the amended provision i.e., Section 153(3) of the Act, as of today the AO is bereft .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates