Decoding the Penalty Provisions under Section 271(1)(c): Analyzing the Fine Line Between Concealment and Inaccuracy in Taxation

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... rendered by the Bombay High Court delves into the intricate aspects of the Income Tax Act , particularly focusing on the imposition of penalties under Section 271(1)(c) . The case presents a significant exploration of the nuances in distinguishing between 'concealment of income' and 'furnishing inaccurate particulars of income,' two pivotal concepts in tax law jurisprudence. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ed a clear demarcation between 'concealment of particulars of income' and 'furnishing inaccurate particulars of income,' which are distinct grounds for penalty under the Act. Defective Notice and Legal Implications: The appellant contended that the notice issued under Section 274 , read with Section 271 , was defective, impacting the validity of the penalty proceedings .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Outcome: The court allowed the appeal, holding that the penalty imposed was not sustainable as the core charge of furnishing inaccurate particulars of income was not established. Implications and Significance This judgment is a landmark in clarifying the scope and application of penalties under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act . It underscores the need for precision in tax .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X