Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2009 (7) TMI 150

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... is involved in these appeals and, therefore, both are being taken up together for disposal. 2. After hearing ld. DR and on perusal of the records, it is seen that the appellants are engaged in the manufacturer of Cement clinker and cement classifiable under Heading No. 25.02 of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The appellants availed Cenvat credit facility on inputs, capital go .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... any evidence in this regard that the said cabs were used by their officials for marketing of their products only. It has further observed that in the absence of such evidence, the credit cannot be allowed. It is contended by the appellant in the memo of appeal that the relevant supporting documents had been submitted in reply to the show cause notice. Thus, it is required to be examined by the Co .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ed in the factory of manufacturer. It has also been held that the telephone used in the Area Marketing Office cannot be said to be used in or in relation to manufacture of final product or in relation to manufacturer of final product or clearance of the final products from the place of removal. The appellants relied upon the Board's Circular vide F. No. 137/85/2007.CX. 4 reported in 2007 (7) S.T.R .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... he Tribunal in the case of Indian Rayon Industries Ltd. reported in 2006 (4) S.T.R. 79 (T-M) held that credit cannot be denied on telephone services as it was not installed in the factory. Further, the Tribunal in the case of Keltech Energies Ltd. v. CCE - 2008 (10) S.T.R. 280 (Tri.-Bang.) =  (2008) 14 STT 419 (Bangalore-CESTAT) and ITC Ltd. v. CC & CCE - 2009 (14) S.T.R. 847 (Tri.-Chennai) = .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ce". In the present case, the Mandap Keeper services utilised in relation to business activities. In view of that, the denial of credit on input-service of Mandap Keeper is not proper. 3. In view of the above discussion, denial of credit on telephone service and Mandap Keeper are set aside. The denial of credit on Air Travel Agent, Renta-Cab and Maintenance and Repair Services are set aside and t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates