Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1982 (1) TMI 60

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ority under the Act, and ex. P-1 assessment order was issued levying estate duty of Rs. 14,46,7. The duty so levied not having been paid, an attempt was made to recover the sum under the provisions of the Kerala Revenue Recovery Act, 1968 (for short " the R.R. Act "). The first respondent, who is the Special Deputy Tahsildar (Arrear Collection), Tellicherry, issued Ex. P-2 notice under s. 49(2) of the R.R. Act stating that if the estate duty together with costs and interest is not paid, the land in T.S. No. 106 of the Tellicherry Municipality will be sold. The petitioner claiming to be in occupation of this land, is aggrieved by Ex. P-2 notice. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, estate duty can be recovered as an arrear .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... n the property liable thereto. Section 73(1) requires the Controller to serve notice of demand on the person accountable or liable to pay the duty specifying the sum payable and the time for payment. Section 73(5) says that the provisions of sub-ss. (1), (1)(a), (2) to (5), (5)(a) and (6) and (7) of s. 46 and s. 47 of the Indian I.T. Act, 1922, shall apply as if the said provisions were provisions of the Act and referred to estate duty instead of to income-tax and the Controller instead of the ITO. The Indian I.T. Act, 1922, was repealed by the I.T. Act, 1961 (see s. 297). The provisions referred to in s. 73(5) of the Act have corresponding provisions in the I.T. Act, 1961, and they are ss. 221(1), 222(1), 226(5), 116(2), 226(3), 227, 231, .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... contains a provision by incorporation and not merely a provision of reference. It does not merely make mention or refer to certain provisions of the Indian I.T. Act, 1922. It says that these provisions shall apply as if they were provisions of the E.D. Act and the reference to the ITO shall be considered as a reference to the Controller and the reference to income-tax shall be understood as a reference to estate duty. In other words, certain provisions of the Indian I.T. Act, 1922, have been bodily incorporated into the scheme of the E.D. Act. This is a scheme of the incorporation and, therefore, the repeal of the Indian I.T. Act, 1922, will not have the effect of the provisions of the re-enacted Act being rendered applicable to the E.D. Ac .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... rgument of the learned counsel for the petitioner based on s. 46(5) of the Indian I.T. Act, 1922, and the corresponding section in the I.T. Act, 1961, whereunder the State Govt. can cause recovery of the tax in the same manner as and by the same person, who would be competent to recover municipal tax or local rate due and that reference to municipal tax and local rate would indicate that only officers of the local bodies such as a Municipality, Panchayat, Corporation, etc., who could take steps for recovery and not officers under the R.R. Act. Since recovery is competent under s. 46(2) of the Indian I.T. Act, 1922, it is unnecessary for me to consider the exact scope of s. 46(5) of that Act. In the result, this original petition is dismis .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates