Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2024 (4) TMI 747

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 20 passed by the Tribunal may kindly be set aside and the order of AO may kindly be restored and upheld. Any other order which may be considered just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may kindly be passed in favour of the appellant. Cost of the appeal be awarded in favour of the appellant." 2. The respondent-Company (assessee) is engaged in the manufacturing & trading of synthetic fabric and filed its e-return on 28.09.2015 declaring its total income as Rs. 1,14,56,120/-. Thereafter, the case was selected for scrutiny through CASS and a notice under Section 143 (2) of the Act of 1961 was issued on 27.07.2016 to the respondent-Company, and subsequently, another notice under section 142 (1) of the Act of 1961 was issued .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... appeal, while quashing the assessment order dated 29.12.2017, accordingly, deleted the addition of Rs. 25 lacs made by the Assessing Officer under Section 68 of the Act of 1961 and disallowance of the interest of Rs. 24,658/-. 2.4. Being aggrieved by the order dated 13.03.2018 passed by the learned CIT, the appellant preferred an appeal (I.T.A. No. 279/ Jodh/2018) before the learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Jodhpur Bench, (in short, 'Appellate Tribunal'). The learned Appellate Tribunal vide the impugned order dated 21.12.2020 dismissed the said appeal. The copy of the said order was received on 10.02.2021. Thus, being aggrieved of the said order, the present appeal has been preferred claiming the afore-quoted reliefs. 3. Learned cou .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... elected for scrutiny through CASS and notices were issued. The respondent-Company raised its share capital by allotment of equity shares; firstly, it issued 1,81,816 number of equity shares, and later, issued 3,40,665 number of equity shares, in total 5,22,481 number of equity shares each having face value of Rs. 10/- and share premium of Rs. 45/- and Rs. 50/- were issued to total 11 companies; the respondent-Company received a sum of Rs. 3,04,39,780/- on allotment of total 5,22,481 shares. 5.1. Thereafter, the appellant-Department issued the Assessment Order (AO) dated 29.12.2017, assessing the respondent- Company's total income as Rs. 4,20,76,100/-, and accordingly, the penalty proceedings under Section 271 (1) (c) of the Act of 1961 wer .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 439780. The Ld Assessing Officer has invoked and initiated section 68 of the act (i.e. unexplained credit) without considering the facts provision of the act and reasoning of the various judgments. 2. Ld AO grossly erred in disallowing Rs. 150000 out of various expenses without appreciating that all the expenditure are supported by details, voucher and fully explained and considering the volume of business of the assessee. 3. The Ld AO grossly erred in disallowing Rs. 5540 of Employees Contribution to ESI without appreciating the fact that all the contributions are deposited on or before the due date of filing the return by the assessee. 4. The learned assessing officer has grossly erred in law and on the facts of the case on making a .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... py of share application money, Share capital and share premium" 7.2. This Court also observes that once the respondent-Company furnished all the relevant and requisite documents, and in the assessment order, there is nothing which could show that the respondent-Company introduced its own income from undisclosed sources in the form of shares; the assessment order was passed only on the basis of suspicion and doubt, which is not permissible under the law, as has rightly been held by the learned CIT in its order, which in turn has rightly been upheld by the learned Appellate Tribunal vide the impugned order. 7.3. This Court further observes that the learned CIT as well as learned Appellate Tribunal have rightly ordered deletion of the above- .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates