The NCLAT addressed issues regarding the approval of a Resolution Plan by Suraksha Realty Limited,...

The NCLAT addressed issues regarding the approval of a Resolution Plan by Suraksha Realty Limited, focusing on the treatment of claims filed in the CIRP of the Corporate Debtor. The key question was whether YEIDA is a secured creditor of the Corporate Debtor. The NCLAT held that YEIDA is indeed a secured creditor, based on a Supreme Court judgment. The treatment of YEIDA's claim in the Resolution Plan was deemed unsustainable by the Adjudicating Authority. The NCLAT also discussed the claim towards EDC, concluding that it is not a secured claim under the 1976 Act. Consent of YEIDA was not required for treatment of its claims in the CIRP or for transfer of leasehold rights. The NCLAT directed the SRA to pay the Appellant its secured operatio..... .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X