TMI Blog2024 (6) TMI 947X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... :- The Division Bench of this Court in A. Venkatachalam v. Assistant Commissioner (ST), Palladam [ 2024 (2) TMI 488 - MADRAS HIGH COURT] where it was held that ' It is made clear that there shall be no recovery of GST on royalty until the Nine Judge Constitution Bench takes a decision.' T he petitioner is permitted to submit his reply to the intimation within a maximum period of four weeks ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... on Bench of this Court issued the following directions at paragraph 9 of the judgment: 9. In these circumstances, we deem it fit and appropriate to issue the following directions: (i) In the cases, where the challenge is made to the show cause notices, the writ petitioners shall submit their objections / representations within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e circular, it is open to the writ petitioners to act upon, after the outcome of the case pending before the Nine Judge Constitution Bench. (vi) It is also made clear that all the contentions are left open for the writ petitioners to raise in appropriate proceedings, after the outcome of the decision of the Nine Judge Constitution Bench. 5. In view of the said judgment, these petitions are liable ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|