The case involved a dispute regarding the refund of Cenvat duty on education cess and secondary & higher...

The case involved a dispute regarding the refund of Cenvat duty on education cess and secondary & higher education cess. The appellant, registered in Jammu & Kashmir, availed area-based exemption under Notification No. 56/2002-CE. The issue was whether education cess and S&H education cess paid through Cenvat Credit account could be refunded. The Supreme Court precedent clarified that exemptions must be explicitly stated in notifications. The tribunal found the rejection of a portion of the refund valid but held that appropriation of a specific amount without notice or hearing was improper. The appeal was partially allowed, with the rejection of a refund amount upheld but the appropriation set aside. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X