9911796707
TMI Blog2024 (7) TMI 258X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... r the petitioner-assessee and Sri Ankur Agarwal, learned counsel for the revenue. 2. Pursuant to the earlier order, Sri Ankur Agarwal, learned counsel for the revenue has received written instructions. In absence of any dispute as to fact, the matter has been proceeded with the consent of parties at the fresh stage itself. 3. Challenge has been raised to the order dated 26.12.2023 passed by the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... arned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner was completely denied opportunity of oral hearing before the Assessing Authority. 5. Relying on Section 75(4) of the U.P. GST Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') as interpreted by a coordinate bench of this Court in Bharat Mint & Allied Chemicals Vs. Commissioner Commerical Tax & 2 Ors., (2022) 48 VLJ 325, it has been then asse ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... sonal hearing (in the reply to the show-cause-notice), submitted through online mode. Having thus declined the opportunity of hearing, the petitioner cannot turn around to claim any error in the impugned order passed consequently. 7. Having hearing learned counsel for the parties and having perused the record, Section 75(4) of the Act reads as under : "An opportunity of hearing shall be granted ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... iability, observing such minimal opportunity of hearing is a must. Principle of natural justice would commend to this Court to bind the authorities to always ensure to provide such opportunity of hearing. It has to be ensured that such opportunity is granted in real terms. Here, we note, the impugned order itself has been passed on 26.12.2023, while reply to the show-cause-notice had been entertai ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
