9911796707
TMI Blog2021 (8) TMI 1420X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... d any claim on account of detention or the like? - HELD THAT:- It is recorded that the matter has been taken up on the appellant s submission that the appellant has no claim against the second respondent and the order that the appellant seeks will not prejudice the second respondent. In view of the fact that the first respondent has already made a claim on account of container detention charges or ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nt to an order obtained on a writ petition filed in this Court, the goods have been provisionally assessed and released for delivery. However, during the interregnum, considerable time was lost which resulted in the containers of the first respondent herein being detained. 3. The appellant seeks to rely on the Handing of Cargo on Customs Area s Regulations, 2009, to suggest that upon an appropriat ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... t that a bill for an amount in excess of Rs. 70 lakh has been raised, though the value of the goods imported is approximately Rs. 14 lakh. 6. The first respondent is not represented despite service. According to the appellant, the first respondent was represented by one of its directors appearing in person before the Single Bench. The order impugned was passed on May 19, 2021 on a prereference pet ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
