Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
GST - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights September 2024 Year 2024 This

The High Court held that GST Authorities cannot launch ...


GST Authorities Must Follow GST Act Procedures Before Prosecution; IPC Use Without Sanction Is Invalid.

September 16, 2024

Case Laws     GST     HC

The High Court held that GST Authorities cannot launch prosecution invoking penal provisions under the Indian Penal Code without invoking penal provisions of the GST Act, when the alleged offenses are covered under the GST Act provisions. This is especially true without obtaining sanction u/s 132(6) of the GST Act. The GST Act is a special legislation comprehensively dealing with GST-related procedures, penalties, and offenses. Allowing GST Authorities to bypass the prescribed procedure under the GST Act by simply invoking IPC provisions, without invoking GST Act penal provisions, especially when allegations constitute offenses covered under the GST Act, would amount to circumventing procedural safeguards like obtaining the Commissioner's sanction before initiating prosecution u/s 132(6). Such a course of action would be an abuse of the legal process, which cannot be permitted. Consequently, the prosecution launched without following the due process under the GST Act is hit by the legal bar and warrants quashment.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. GST Authorities invoked penal provisions under Indian Penal Code against the petitioner without invoking penal provisions of GST Act, despite the alleged offences being...

  2. Grant of Sanction for prosecution - In the present case, except the office communication dated 01.08.2014, there is no separate sanction order which is accorded by the...

  3. Prosecution of offence u/s 276-B r/w 278B(2) - belated payment of TDS into the Central Government Treasury - The sanction was granted without considering payment of...

  4. Prosecution proceedings u/s 276CC - failure to file ITR in time - Since the law provides that without sanction u/s 278B of the IT Act, the Department cannot proceed...

  5. The High Court addressed the issue of parallel proceedings initiated by both State and Central GST Authorities against the petitioner for the same assessment years. For...

  6. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 was invalid due to lack of valid sanction as required u/s 151. The competent authority must independently apply its mind based on...

  7. The High Court held that prosecution u/ss 276C, 277, 278B, and 278E for tax evasion was invalid as it violated CBDT guidelines. Prosecution was premature without the...

  8. Exemption from GST - pure services or supply of goods to the Notified Area Authority, Vapi - Notified Area Authority, Vapi is a “local authority” or “governmental...

  9. Challenge to the State GST authorities demanding input tax credit availed by the petitioner along with interest and penalty for IGST paid on manpower supply services...

  10. Reassessment proceedings invalidated due to improper sanctioning authority. Sanction accorded by Principal Commissioner instead of Principal Chief Commissioner as...

  11. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Eligibility of reasons to believe - Entire recording of reasons to believe formed by the Assessing Officer were produced before the...

  12. Prosecution proceedings - Import of goods without valid license - import of ball bearings (restricted items) instead of spare parts of Road Rollers - Necessary sanction...

  13. Evasion of custom duty - whether the Customs Act prohibits the criminal prosecution under the IPC - The investigating agency or the police would have jurisdiction to...

  14. Seeking grant of bail - Evasion of GST - The High Court identified several deficiencies in the prosecution's case. Firstly, the absence of prior sanction from the...

  15. Validity of reopening of assessment u/s 147 - One wonders whether the sanctioning authority under Section 151 also would have even applied his mind because the reasons...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates