9911796707
TMI Blog2024 (8) TMI 77X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... of the IRP to contest the adjudication proceedings - HELD THAT:- No further notice was issued or date was fixed in the adjudication proceedings. The impugned order came to be passed within a fortnight therefrom. Also it is not in dispute that subsequently vide order dated 15.04.2024 passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, Chennai, the order dated 03.04.2024 passed by the NCLT appoin ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... enue. 2. Challenge has been raised to the order dated 26.04.2024 passed by the respondent no.2 under Section 73 of the U.P. GST Act, 2017. 2. Undeniably the petitioner was issued show cause notice dated 10.04.2024 fixing the date 15.04.2024. It is admitted to the respondent- adjudicating authority that the petitioner submitted partial reply to that notice, dated 12.04.2024. In that it was clearly ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ioner the petitioner is out of insolvency proceedings. 6. In view of such facts, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending or calling for a counter affidavit at this stage. Clearly once the petitioner was undergoing resolution before the Interim Resolution Professional and the fact of IRP appointment was communicated to the adjudicating authority, it may not have passed th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
