9911796707
TMI Blog2018 (4) TMI 1991X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... d by the petitioner was not accepted by the trial court as well as the Apex Court. The petitioner has not chosen to file the first appeal in time. But he has filed the present petition to condone the delay in filing the appeal suit, by narrating the same reasons stated in the petition to set aside the ex-parte decree. The said reasons stated by the petitioner was also not accepted by the Apex Cour ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... iled in O.S. No. 76 of 2015 on the file of the III Additional District Court, Trichy, against the petitioner, the summon was not properly served on him and thereafter, an ex-parte decree was passed against him on 09.10.2015 and against which, he filed petition to set aside the exparte decree along with condone delay application before the trial court, which was dismissed on 04.01.2017 and hence, h ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... that the petitioner knowing fully well of the ex-parte decree, with an intention to drag on the proceedings, had filed the petition to set aside the ex-parte decree and it was dismissed by the trial court and the same was also confirmed by this court as well as the Apex Court and the petitioner has not given sufficient reasons for the condonation of delay and the petitioner by giving the same reas ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... and the same was also dismissed. Afterwards, the petitioner filed SLP before the Hon'ble Supreme Court, which was also dismissed. Hence, the petitioner filed the present petition to condone the delay of 546 days in filing the first appeal before this court. 7. In the present petition also, the petitioner stated the same reasons stated in the petition to set aside the ex-parte decree. The reaso ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
