9911796707
TMI Blog2024 (8) TMI 724X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Mr. Abhay Kumar, AOR Mr. Karan Chopra, Adv. Ms. Sonia Mathur, Sr. Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR For the Respondent : Ms. Sonia Mathur, Sr. Adv. Mr. Rajat Nair, Adv. Mr. Zoheb Hussain, Adv. Mr. Annam Venkatesh, Adv. Mr. Arkaj Kumar, Adv. Ms. Aakriti Mishra, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Ms. Sonia Mathur, Sr. Adv. Ms. Noor Rampal, Adv. Ms. Ronika Tater, Adv. Ms. Madhumitha Kesavan, Adv. Mr. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... er operative. By the impugned judgment, the High Court has held that the writ petitions filed by the petitioners challenging the order of attachment were not maintainable. As even according to the petitioners, the order of attachment is not in existence, no purpose will be served by keeping these Petitions pending. The order by which the accused are discharged is subject-matter of challenge in th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ove by the respondent- Directorate of Enforcement. Pending applications stand disposed of accordingly. SLP (CRL.) NOS. 5318-5319/2017 [ITEM NO.22.2] In the revision petitions filed by the petitioner-Directorate of Enforcement before the High Court, by the impugned order dated 19th May, 2017, the High Court directed the respondents in the revision petitions to file a response and permitted the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
