9911796707
TMI Blog2024 (9) TMI 1457X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... r : Mr.N.Sankara Sabari For the Respondents : Mr.A.P.Srinivas, Senior Standing Counsel ORDER The writ petition has been filed challenging the rejection order of the 2nd respondent, dated 30.01.2024 and also seeking a direction to the respondents to return the petitioner's original documents seized from his house during the raid conducted by the officials on 27.02.2015 against his son A.Arpu ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... that, since the petitioner has already paid 50% of the tax along with interest, a direction was issued to the second respondent to release the document in question and on receipt of the document, the petitioner shall pay the 50% balance amount of tax within 15 days. Upon complying with the directions of this Court, the respondents only released the three documents seized by them. The petitioner se ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... . Subsequently, the petitioner sent another representation to the second respondent on 29.12.2023. However, the representation was rejected and the impugned order was passed on 30.01.2024. Hence, the same is liable to set aside. 3. On the other hand, the learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that only 5 documents were seized from the premises of the petitioner an ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... itioner, who is a third party. 4. Heard the learned counsel on both sides and perused the materials available on record. 5. In the present case, the issue is with regard to return of the original documents seized during the search conducted in the petitioner's house. Totally, 5 documents were seized from the premises of the petitioner. The petitioner seeks return of the documents which were ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
