TMI Blog2024 (10) TMI 200X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Durairaj For the Respondent : Mr. Harsha Raj, AGP ORDER This writ petition has been filed challenging the proceedings of the respondent dated 29.11.2023. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader accepting notice for the respondent. 3. The petitioner is engaged in manufacturing business and is registered under the Tamil Nadu Goods and Servic ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... t though sufficient opportunity was given, the petitioner did not avail the opportunity and that the impugned order does not suffer from any illegality. Consequently, he has sought for dismissal of this writ petition. 6. This Court has carefully considered the submissions of the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record and more particularly the impugned proceed ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rder passed by the respondent in Reference No.ZD331123185891E dated 29.11.2023 is hereby set aside. The matter is remanded back to the respondent for a fresh consideration on condition that the petitioner shall pay 10% of the total demand to the respondent within a period of four weeks from today. If this condition is not complied with, the order passed by the respondent shall stand automatically ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|