9911796707
TMI Blog2022 (1) TMI 1468X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ng that the reassessment was bad in law calls for interference? - HELD THAT:- We find that initially the assessing officer did not comply with the mandate in GKN Driveshaft ( India) Ltd [ 2002 (11) TMI 7 - SUPREME COURT] in the sense that he did not pass a speaking order on the objection given by the assessee to the proposal to reassess the income. When this order was put to challenge before the C ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ...for the appellant. Mr. J.P.Khaitan, Sr. Adv. Ms. Swapna Das, Adv. Mr. Siddhartha Das, Adv. ...for the respondent. The Court : This appeal filed by the revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act for brevity) is directed against the order dated 26th July, 2017 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, B Bench, Kolkata (the Tribunal in short) in ITA No.1636/Kol/2014 for the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nt does not have any grievance against the action of CIT(Appeals), Asansol in allowing the appeal on the legal issue that the procedure relating to re-assessment under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 mandated by the Hon ble Supreme Court of India that assessee s objection in respect of re-opening has to be disposed of by a speaking order has not been followed is incorrect? We have heard Mr ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... aside and the matter was remanded to the assessing officer to pass a speaking order on the objection by keeping the appeal pending on the file of the CIT(A). Despite such opportunity, the assessing officer failed to follow the mandate laid down by Hon ble Supreme Court in GKN Driveshaft (India) Ltd. When the appeal was taken up by the CIT (Appeals), this aspect was noted and relief was granted to ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
