1990 (7) TMI 381

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... b and Haryana High Court upholding the respondent-landowner's claim to interest which the High Court directed the Executing Court to determine. The proceedings in the High Court arose in a Revision Petition filed by the landowner against the order of the Executing Court disallowing her claim to interest. It must be noticed that before the Executing Court, the State of Haryana was the sole resp .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the compensation has not been paid, the Collector should deposit the amount of the compensation in the Court to which reference can be made under Section 18 of the Act. Section 34 provides for payment of interest in the event of compensation, which has to be paid or deposited in the Court as provided under Section 31, being not so paid or deposited before taking possession of the land. 4. In the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... er. The High Court was justified in directing the necessary parties to appear in the Executing Court for determination of the amount. 7. We make it clear that insofar as the landowner is concerned, his right to be compensated is enforceable against the State. It is the liability of the Collector in terms of the relevant provisions to pay the amount awarded, together with interest in the event of t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X