Proceeds of crime were considered regarding the refund amount from unsuccessful IPO applications due to...

Proceeds of crime were considered regarding the refund amount from unsuccessful IPO applications due to malpractices and manipulations by certain entities. The SEBI determined unlawful gains by taking the difference between the sale and allotment amounts, while the FIR/ECIR recorded the entire amount as 'proceeds of crime' used for cheating the public. The SEBI order was within its provisions, distinct from the Act of 2002. There were no discrepancies or contradictions in the amount mentioned in the orders. The allegation of discrimination in treatment was unsubstantiated. The appeals failed as none of the arguments raised by the appellant had merit. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X