9911796707
TMI Blog2024 (11) TMI 868X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... putation sheet. However, we are of the view that this plea of the assessee requires verification at the end of AO. Accordingly, we set aside the order passed by the Ld.CIT(A) on this issue and restore the same to the file of AO for examining this plea of the assessee. If it is an error as pointed out by the assessee, then the AO may correct the same. Addition made u/s. 14A - assessee had earned share income from partnership firm and claimed same as exempt. However, the assessee did not make any disallowance u/s. 14A - HELD THAT:- We notice that the investment have been made by the assessee in the year 2000-01 and Over Draft facility has been obtained from ICICI Bank in November, 2014. Hence, there is merit in the contentions of the Ld A.R t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... al income; b) Addition made u/s. 14A of the Act; 2. The assessee-company is engaged in the business of trading in agro commodities. The assessment for the year under consideration was completed u/s. 143(3) of the Act. Since the AO has varied the total income, the assessee filed appeal before the Ld.CIT(A) and the same was partly allowed. Still aggrieved, the assessee has filed this appeal. 3. The first issue relates to error in the computation of total income in the Computation Sheet attached with the assessment order. The Ld.AR invited our attention to pg. No. 4 of the assessment order, wherein the total income was determined by the AO at Rs. 16,82,668/-. However, in the computation sheet, the total income was taken by the AO at Rs. 36,69, ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... was computed at 0.5% of the average value of the investment. Accordingly, he disallowed a sum of Rs. 16,70,192/- in aggregate u/s. 14A of the Act. 5.1. In the appellate proceedings, the assessee submitted before the Ld.CIT(A) that the interest free funds available with the assessee is more than the value of the investment and hence, no disallowance out of interest is called for. It was also submitted that the assessee has availed bank Over Draft for meeting its day-to-day working capital requirements and the said amount was not utilized for making investments. It was also submitted that the loan was availed from the bank in the year 2014; whereas investments were made by the assessee much earlier i.e., in the year 2000-01 and accordingly n ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ny Ltd., [221 TAXMAN 479], the Ld.AR submitted that the disallowance out of interest expenditure is not required to be made. Alternatively, the Ld.AR submitted that the interest free funds available with the assessee consisting of own funds and net trade payable is in excess of the value of investment and hence with that count also no disallowance out of in interest expenditure is called-for. 5.3. With regard to disallowance made under Rule 8D(2)(iii), the Ld.AR submitted that there is mistake in the computation of average value of investment by the AO and if the said mistake is corrected, the disallowance would come down to Rs. 1,98,699/-. 5.4. We heard Ld.DR on this issue and perused the record. We notice that the investment have been mad ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
