Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights November 2024 Year 2024 This

The case pertains to the rectification of a mistake and ...


ITAT Revisits Reassessment After Mistake in Dismissing Appeal, Ensures Fair Hearing Under Income Tax Act Sections 147 & 153C.

November 19, 2024

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

The case pertains to the rectification of a mistake and reopening of assessment u/s 147 versus assessment u/s 153C. The information or seized document belonging to the assessee was found at the searched person's place. The authorized representative mentioned that the Tribunal did not consider judicial decisions and dismissed the additional ground of appeal, upholding the CIT(A)'s decision on the validity of reassessment proceedings u/s 147. The ITAT supported its view relying on the Supreme Court's decision in Honda Siel Power Productions Ltd., where the Tribunal's rectification application was allowed as it had missed considering a precedent judgment while dismissing the appeal on enhanced depreciation u/s 43A. The ITAT held that non-consideration of cited judicial decisions is a mistake apparent from the record. Accordingly, in the interest of natural justice, the Tribunal recalled its order and directed the registry to post the appeal for regular hearing and inform the parties.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. HC set aside ITAT's rectification order under Section 254(2) of Income Tax Act, finding ITAT exceeded its jurisdiction in reviewing income classification. The dispute...

  2. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) set aside the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] under the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) and...

  3. Jurisdiction of the Bench to Hear the application of Rectification of Mistake - recall of the entire order - an application for rectification of a mistake u/s129B (2) of...

  4. The High Court quashed the reassessment proceedings initiated by the Assessing Officer u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act, holding it to be a case of "change of opinion" and...

  5. Rectification of mistake u/s 154 - Though there is a remedy to revise the return but if the assessee could not revised its return of income within the period prescribed,...

  6. Validity of reassessment proceedings u/s 147/148 - Unexplained cash credit and application of section 115BB - The ITAT while upheld the reassessment proceedings sicne AO...

  7. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that the reassessment notices issued u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act for the assessment years 2013-14, 2014-15, and 2015-16...

  8. Validity of reopening of assessment - Re-opening notice u/s 148A(d) - personal hearing refused - the High court concluded that Section 148A(b) does not mandate a...

  9. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - The High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the revenue, affirming the decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) that...

  10. The ITAT set aside the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] granting relief to the assessee (anonymized party) on the ground that the matter was...

  11. The High Court quashed refund rejection orders for lack of opportunity for personal hearing as mandated by Rule 92(3) of CGST Rules, 2017, violating principles of...

  12. The Allahabad High Court addressed the denial of a personal hearing in a tax assessment case, emphasizing the mandatory nature of such hearings u/s 75(4) of the U.P. GST...

  13. In the case of 2024 (5) TMI 1099 before ITAT Mumbai, the issue was the validity of a reassessment order. The CIT (A) passed an order that contained different grounds...

  14. Characterization of receipts - Treatment of interest income from staff loans and advances, interest income from other loans and advances and miscellaneous income -...

  15. ITAT quashed reassessment proceedings initiated u/s 148 against assessee. There was a difference between reasons communicated in notice u/s 148A(b) alleging bogus...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates