9911796707
TMI Blog2023 (8) TMI 1588X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nd, Adv. Mr. Anant Sangal, Adv. Mr. Siddhartha Sinha, AOR For the Respondent : Mr. Sarvesh Singh Baghel, AOR Mr. Dhawal Uniyal, Adv. Mr. Arun Pratap Singh Rajawat, Adv. Ms. Sonia Mathur, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, AOR Mr. Shlok Chandra, Adv. Ms. Bani Dikshit, Adv. Ms. Sristi Mishra, Adv. Mr. Madhav Sinhal, Adv. Ms. N ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e. This Court is of the opinion that having regard to the previous opportunities granted and the circumstance that the petitioner had enjoyed liberty for the last 9 months or so, the request for further extension of time is not reasonable. It is, accordingly rejected. The basis for the FIR in this case was alleged claim for wrongful ITC - which the revenue alleged was to the extent about Rs.12 Cr ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... is Court has depracated imposition of such onerous conditions previously-notably in the recent order in "Subhash Chouhan v. Union of India" (Criminal Appeal No. 186 of 2023) decided on 20.01.2023. 4. Following the order in Subhash Chouhan v. Union of India, the condition requiring the petitioner to deposit Rs.2 crores is hereby set aside. The Court is informed that the petitioner had borrowed s ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
