2025 (1) TMI 42

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... iket Deepak Agrawal, AOR And Mr. Akash Shukla, Adv. For the Respondent(s) : Mr. K M Natraj, A.S.G., Mr. Raj Bahadur Yadav, AOR, Ms. Gargi Khanna, Adv., Mr. Kanu Agarwal, Adv., Mr. H R Rao, Adv., Mr. Akshay Amritanshu, Adv., Mrs. Rekha Pandey, Adv. And Mr. Annirudh Sharma II, Adv. ORDER 1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the appellant. 2. The finding of the High Court in the impugned judgme .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e High Court that apart from resolution of the Board, no other material was placed on record in support of the claim for deduction. Accordingly, we decline to interfere with the impugned judgment. However, we make it clear that the view taken by the High Court in the impugned judgment will remain confined to the Assessment Years 1990-1991, 1991-1992 and 1992-1993. The findings of the High Court wh .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X