2025 (1) TMI 207

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... inav Mehrotra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ravi Shankar Pandey, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State respondents. The impugned order arises out of proceedings which were instituted after interception of the vehicle carrying the offending goods. The revenue authorities upon finding that the E-Way Bill was not filled asked the assessee to show cause. After physical .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... rded in the E-Way Bill available with the driver of the vehicle. The authorities below have not found any intent to evade tax. This Court has set its face against initiation of proceedings under Section 129 of GST Act in the wake of mere technical breaches. When substantial compliance of the provisions is disclosed and when the physical inspection of goods tallies with the goods declared in the E .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ing of the vehicle no. in Part-B cannot be a ground for seizure of the goods. We hold that the order of seizure is totally illegal and once the petitioner has placed the material and evidence with regard to its claim, it was obligatory on the part of the respondent no.2 to consider and pass an appropriate reasoned order. In this case, no reasons are assigned nor any discussion is mentioned in the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X