9911796707
TMI Blog2008 (3) TMI 791X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... first information report was lodged. A charge sheet was filed in the said case against him on or about 18.6.1997. Appellant filed an application inter alia for supply of the copies of item Nos. 1 and 20 of the documents mentioned in the said charge sheet. The same was not issued to him. Several contentions in regard thereto were raised. He moved the High Court in revision which was marked as Criminal Revision No. 90 of 1999 3. By an order dated 20.4.2001, a learned Single Judge of the High Court directed supply of the said documents to the petitioner, stating; 16. Various points were raised on behalf of both sides but it is unnecessary to enter into all those points on merit at this stage as I find that the order passed by the learned Spec ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ly upon in support of his defence, can be looked into at the stage of framing of the charge. 7. Mr. Saurabh Mishra, the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant would submit that keeping in view the order passed by the High Court on 20.4.2001 in Criminal Revision No. 90 of 1999, it is evident that Central Bureau of Investigation itself has seized the said documents from the residence of the appellant and in that view of the matter, he could rely thereupon. 8. Mr. B.B. Singh, the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the State, on the other hand, would submit that from a perusal of the order passed by the learned Special Judge, it would be evident that the appellant intended to rely upon some documents which were filed before th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ments related to the assets of his wife exclusively and one related to his mother's assets. 23 documents, thus, related to the assets of the appellant which are reflected in his declaration of assets made annually by him. 12. The learned Special Judge, however, considering the documents on record opined; ...But at this stage I find that unless the documents filed by the defence are not formally proved no finding can be given, because it would amount to discussion the merit of the case before conclusion of trial. However, the materials collected in the case diary by the prosecution reveals that there are ground for framing charge under the aforesaid sections against the accused petitioner. Hence, the above petition stands rejected. 13. T ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
