9911796707
TMI Blog2025 (1) TMI 823X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... s, we were not shown the precise nature of the information sought by the petitioner and the information denied to the petitioner. Considerable Judicial time was occupied in this exercise. The petitioner has not bothered to disclose details of the pending suit in which the petitioner is impleaded as a defendant. There are sufficient provisions in the Civil Procedure Code for obtaining information like interrogatories etc., assuming that such information is relevant. Petitioner has not explained why the petitioner did not seek such information under the Right to Information Act, 2005. An averment is made that the petitioner has no other alternate and efficacious remedy. This averment is made with utmost casualness and without assuming any ser ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ndes states that the relief under prayer clause (b) stands worked out, given the reply filed on behalf of the respondent. 4. On instructions, he states that the petitioner s representations are suitably redressed and action as expected by the petitioner has also been taken. Therefore, he does not press for any relief regarding prayer clause (b). 5. Regarding prayer clause (a), he refers to the report of the Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO) and Committee constituted by this Court i.e. Exhibits C and D of the petition. He submits that with regard to such reports and observations made therein, the petitioner had sought for certain information regarding the action taken on the letters addressed by the petitioner to the respondents or a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... sualness and without assuming any serious responsibility. 11. The respondents filed their affidavit on 19 April 2021. In 2025, we are informed that the petitioner is satisfied with the respondent's action in the context of prayer clause (b), which we thought was the main relief in this petition. Still, this petition was not moved and has been pending for all these years. As noted earlier, considerable judicial time had to be spent because no proper answers were forthcoming. Even the pleadings in this petition are entirely vague. 12. For all these reasons, we dismiss this petition with costs of Rupees One Lakh payable to the Government KEM Hospital, Parel, within 4 weeks from today. The petitioner should file proof of payment in this Cou ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
