Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

GST Appeal

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... One of My client has received the order. Date of Order in Original :- 31/03/2023 Date of Order received by post:- 23/06/2023 Date of Order Uploaded on GST Portal:- 29/12/2023. Date of filling Appeal 24/01/2024. In this scenario, is the appeal time-barred or not? Kindly provide the relevant notification or any case studies. Appeal Rejected by the officer on ground that appeal is time barred. - Repl .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... y By KASTURI SETHI - The Reply = The Order-in-Appeal is legally correct. The tax payer received the Order-in-Original on 23.6.23 and the appeal should have been filed before the expiry of 90 days. You cannot take the shelter of the date of uploading on Common Portal System. The mode of service of the Order by registered post or speed post is legally valid as per Section 169 (1) (b) of CGST Act . 2 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 025 (1) TMI 517 - MADRAS HIGH COURT-UDUMALPET SARVODAYA SANGHAM. VERSUS THE AUTHORITY, UNDER SHOP AND ESTABLISHMENT ACT/ DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF LABOUR, COIMBATORE. - Reply By KASTURI SETHI - The Reply = Here is a case law in your favour :- 2020 (11) TMI 749 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT M/S. SHRI SHYAM BABA EDIBLE OILS VERSUS THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER AND ANOTHER Violation of principles of Natural Just .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ice - Grievance of the petitioner is that while raising the demand of tax vide summary of order dated 18.09.2020 vide Annexure P/2, the foundational show-cause notice/order No.12 dated 10.06.2020 qua financial year 2018-2019 and tax period April, 2018 to March, 2019, was never communicated to the petitioner who is an individual registered under GST Act - Rule 142 of Central Goods and Services Tax .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Act, 2017 - HELD THAT:- A bare perusal of the aforesaid provision reveals that the only mode prescribed for communicating the show-cause notice/order is by way of uploading the same on website of the revenue. The State in its reply has provided no material to show that show-cause notice/order No.12 dated 10.06.2020 was uploaded on website of revenue. In fact, learned AAG, Shri Mody, fairly concede .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... s that the show-cause notice/order was communicated to petitioner by Email and was not uploaded on website of the revenue - It is trite principle of law that when a particular procedure is prescribed to perform a particular act then all other procedures/modes except the one prescribed are excluded. This principle becomes all the more stringent when statutarily prescribed as is the case herein. Thi .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... s Court has no manner of doubt that statutory procedure prescribed for communicating show-cause notice/order under Rule 142(1) of CGST Act having not been followed by the revenue, the impugned demand dated 18.09.2020 vide Annexure P/2 pertaining to financial year 2018-2019 and tax period April, 2018 to March, 2019 deserves to be and is struck down - Petition allowed. No.- W.P. No.16131/2020 Dated. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... - November 19, 2020 - Reply By KASTURI SETHI - The Reply = Also read para nos.6,7 8 of the following case law :- 2021 (12) TMI 1039 - KERALA HIGH COURT Other Citation: [2022] 96 G S.T.R. 3 (Ker) NELLISSERY CO., VERSUS STATE TAX OFFICER, PALAKKAD, STATE OF KERALA, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, CENTRAL BOARD OF EXCISE AND CUSTOMS, NEW DELHI Service of order - Original copy of order was .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... not received or lost - Direction to serve a copy of an Order issued under Section 129(3) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act - Non-invocation of bank guarantee furnished by the petitioner - whether petitioner was in receipt of the order issued by the first respondent under Section 129(3) of the Act? - HELD THAT:- As per the statutory prescription and going by the averments in the counter af .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... fidavit as well as the documents produced, it is evident that petitioner can be deemed to have been tendered with the order under Section 129(3) on 03.02.2020. The fiction that is created does not leave any room for doubt and since the tendering of notice is by registered post with acknowledgement due, there is no scope for even assuming that the order was not served on the petitioner. In this con .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... text, this Court notices the pleading of the petitioner that he had received the notice for hearing scheduled on 24.01.2020. The copy of dispatch register showing that the order was dispatched on 28.01.2020 and the copy of acknowledgement card produced as Ext.R1(c), fortifies the above conclusion - the order under Section 129(3) of the Act was served on the petitioner on 03.02.2020. Having regard .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... to the contention that petitioner had not received the order or that he may have misplaced the order due to which petitioner ought to be given a certified copy to enable him to pursue appropriate statutory remedy is a contention which merits consideration - Since the petitioner s right to pursue an appeal cannot be curtailed solely on account of non-receipt of an order or loss of an order, if law .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... otherwise permits him to pursue the appeal, then certainly it is incumbent upon the first respondent to issue a certified copy to the petitioner. The first respondent is directed to issue a certified copy of the order to the petitioner in accordance with law forthwith - petition disposed off. No.- W.P.(C) No.21209 of 2021 Dated.- November 3, 2021 - GST Appeal - Query Started By: - HITESH SHAH Da .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ted:- 17-1-2025 Last Replied Date:- 18-1-2025 Goods and Services Tax - GST - Got 3 Replies - GST - Discussion Forum - Knowledge Sharing, reply post by an expert, personal opinion Tax Management India - taxmanagementindia - taxmanagement - taxmanagementindia.com - TMI - TaxTMI - TMITax .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates